As a student of STI and in order to graduate from my chosen program, I am required to take a two-credit course on Microsoft Office products which includes Excel, Word, Powerpoint, and Access. Prior to enrolling at STI and purchasing my Mac, I was a common PC user; I worked on various Windows versions throughout my career and also used Microsoft Office for many home-based projects. Although it had been many years since I had worked with MS Office, I was confident that I could “test out” of this class by using the summer break time to study for the exam.
First, I wrote out a calendar schedule, allowing a couple weeks for each MS product. Using my library access, I found many tutorials on Lynda libraries which also included exercise files I could download. I also found many free tutorials just by doing a Google search. During the last few weeks, I went through each of the “objectives” listing which was given to me by STI testing department and made notes for each objective. At lastly, I used STI’s VMware to access Excel, Powerpoint, Access, and Word to practice each objective. The night before the test, I reviewed and memorized my notes. On June 25th, I took the exam and passed with 98% proficiency.
Believe it or not, my reasoning for writing this blog entry is not to blow my own horn, but to discuss a mindset that, frankly, has frustrated me for years. A week before the exam, I confided to a family member that I had been very busy studying for the test and was a little apprehensive about not passing. Her response to me was, “You’re smart; you’ll pass it.” I absolutely understand that she truly meant this as a complement and that it was said to calm my doubts. However, it also made me wonder why the labels – “smart”, “dumb”, “beautiful” and “ugly” – that people impose on themselves or others seem more important or tangible than the “actions” or behavior of people. I didn’t pass the exam because I magically became “smart”; I passed the exam because I worked my butt off.
This situation also made me think about what people consider as “smart.” Howard Gardener was a psychologist and educator who defined nine types of intelligence: from “logical” which is what most people think of as intelligence … to “bodily-kinesthetic” which describes the brain-body connections of an athlete. A scholar needs to research his thesis, and an athlete must spend countless hours perfecting their sport. Why is it that most think of the definition of “smart” , as a some special ability that one possesses without any effort? With the exception of the rare prodigy, maybe “being smart” means doing one’s homework and being driven to achieve one’s goals.
By 